|Forest Investment Account (FIA) - Forest Science Program|
|FIA Project Y092095|
|Forest Ecosystem Recovery Following Disturbance: A Retrospective Analysis of Historic Disturbances on the Southern BC Coast|
|Project lead: Negrave, Roderick (Ministry of Forests and Range)|
|Contributing Authors: Gerzon, Michael; Seely, Brad A.; MacKinnon, J. Andrew|
|Subject: Forest Investment Account (FIA), British Columbia|
|Series: Forest Investment Account (FIA) - Forest Science Program|
|Many forest managers, including those involved in Ecosystem-Based Management (EBM) , are currently developing recommendations for applying variable retention and other partial cut harvesting systems without adequate field-based information about how these forests have responded to disturbance over the past century of man-caused and natural disturbances. The EBM Handbook, Central Coast Land and Resource Management Management Plan (CCLRMP) and North Coast Land and Resource Management Management Plan (NCLRMP) environmental risk assessments use ecosystem recovery rates and the distribution and abundance of second growth versus old-growth forests as a basis for Environmental Risk Assessment. And the Landscape Unit Planning Guide and Biodiversity Guidebook designate protection of old-growth forests in Old Growth Management Areas. Lack of quantitative information has necessitated the use of expert opinion to provide qualitative ecosystem recovery curves and comparisons of old-growth versus second-growth characteristics. One outcome of this is the designation of stands 250 years or older as ‘old forest’ and stands less than this as ‘younger forest’, with an assumption that age class 9 stands have recovered ‘old growthness’ and, e.g., age class 8 stands haven’t This project will allow us to better quantify when second-growth forests recover the attributes of old-growth forests. This will have important applications to timber supply and biodiversity. Similarly, the impacts of partial cutting/variable retention of timber supply and consequences to socio-economic well being have been estimated without sufficient on-the-ground data to support them. This information is being used in modelling of clearcutting and variable retention scenarios but it has not included sufficient detailed site-specific data from disturbed stands. More detailed information on ecosystem recovery will make modelling results more reliable and provide better guidance to planners involved in SFM and EBM efforts. Quantitative second-growth data are essential to properly evaluate and refine coarse filter biodiversity, ecological risk assessment and timber supply assumptions currently shaping EBM for Coastal LRMP's.|
The overall objective of this project is to quantify selected second growth coastal forest ecosystem attributes in order to provide a field-based assessment of ecosystem recovery following disturbance. This objective will be accomplished through a retrospective examination of existing coastal second growth forest stands that have developed after man-caused and natural disturbances. On the coast, these disturbances will include old A-frame and select-to-cut logging operations, aboriginal burning, and natural disturbances such as windthrow, fluvial disturbances, and landslides. The intent is to characterize the ecological condition and level of ecosystem recovery toward 'old-growth' stand conditions and the development and growth of residual stands and post-disturbance regeneration cohorts. Variables to be assessed will include tree species composition, growth and yield, understory composition, epiphytic composition, soil properties, and stand structure. The essential questions that this study will attempt to answer are: a) What old-growth structures are present in second-growth forests? b) Do different disturbances develop different structures? c) When do old-growth structures develop in second-growth forests?
This will be a two-year project. Our approach emphasises site selection and a limited amount of sampling in the first year with more extensive sampling in the second year of the project. We will sample 30 candidate second growth coastal stands in the CWHvh1 and CWH vm1 BEC units on western and northern Vancouver Island. We will sample stands ranging in age from 60 to 250 years old that have developed from man-caused and natural disturbances and 8 to 12 old-growth stands (over 250 years old) in the same variants and site series. We will produce a final report including graphical, photographic, and written descriptions of second growth stand conditions and growth as well as an assessment of how second-growth attributes and growth compare with old-growth stand conditions where possible. Our findings will be summarized in a draft extension note. This extension note will include a discussion of what level of ecosystem recovery toward old-growth stand conditions can be expected as the operable landbase is gradually converted to second growth forests that are managed on 80 to 150 year rotations. Publication of the extension note will take place in the year following completion of the project using Ministry of Forests funding. We will use sample data to parameterize and evaluate the FORECAST model and its spatially explicit, watershed-scale derivative LLEMS (Local Landscape Ecosystem Management Simulator) based on existing CWH calibration datasets.
The project will be conducted in the traditional territories of the Maa-nulth and Nuu-chah-nulth First Nations, all of whom have a keen interest in a range for forest management practices for commercial, cultural and conservation purposes. These First Nations have not yet been contacted, due to the time limitations of this proposal round and the preference of First Nations for the method of referral contact. Once funding is secured, First Nations whose traditional territory the field sampling will occur in will be contacted in person to discuss the details of the project and First Nation involvement. The project will be conducted over three years. We have chosen to restrict our sampling to Vancouver Island, in order to reduce costs, rather than sampling boat or helicopter-accessible sites. However, sampling from the identified BEC units on northern Vancouver Island will make the results of this project applicable to substantial portions of the Central Coast.
Please note that A. Banner and P. LePage have been removed from the project team, due to heavy commitments of their time that have emerged since our original application. However, we have added Dr. S. Saunders to the team and feel that her addition, and strong commitment to the project, adequately compensates for the removal of the other two members.
|Related projects:  FSP_Y092095,  FSP_Y081095|
|Executive summary (0.3Mb)|
To view PDF documents you need Adobe Acrobat Reader, available free from the Adobe Web Site.
Updated August 16, 2010
Please direct questions or comments regarding publications to For.Prodres@gov.bc.ca