![]() |
| Volume 1 - Resource Management Chapter 2 - Silviculture Policy 2.24 - Stand Density ManagementEffective Date: 15-Feb-99 Resource Management Volume Table of Contents | Amendment Log ScopeThis policy applies to crown land and applies to development and implementation of stand density management activities that are required by law. AuthorityThe Silviculture Practices Regulation (SPR) section 13 (6), provides the Chief Forester with authority to establish, vary, or cancel policies and guidelines respecting stand density management, including matters relating to the maximum density of trees that may be present on an area under a Silviculture Prescription before a spacing treatment must be carried out. For the purposes of SPR section 13, this document is the Chief Forester's policy for stand density management. For the purposes of SPR section 13, the Guidelines for Developing Stand Density Management Regimes (Guidelines) is the Chief Forester's guideline respecting the development of stand density management regimes. Unless otherwise developed following this policy and the Guidelines, the maximum density of coniferous trees is 10 000 stems per hectare (sph). SPR Section 13 allows a Regional Manager (RM) to establish a maximum density of coniferous trees for different parts of a forest region or district in accordance with this policy and the Guidelines. PolicyThe purpose of this policy is to ensure the careful evaluation, planning, and implementation of stand density management activities to achieve desired stand, landscape, and forest level objectives. This policy is intended to:
DefinitionsDensity Management Regime - one or more silviculture interventions to achieve specific stand densities and/or conditions at specific time periods and locations to achieve desired stand, landscape, and/or forest management objectives. Target stocking standard - is the target number of healthy, well-spaced trees of the preferred and acceptable species per hectare. This is the target number of well-spaced trees at the free growing stage that will produce the target future stand condition(s). Minimum stocking standard - is the minimum number of healthy, well-spaced trees of preferred and acceptable species per hectare. This is the minimum number of well-spaced trees needed at the free growing stage to produce the minimum acceptable future stand condition(s). Maximum density - the maximum number of coniferous trees allowed per hectare in a free growing stand. This number is specified in countable trees per hectare. Without density control, areas exceeding the specified maximum density number are not expected to produce the acceptable stand conditions within desired time periods. Only those portions (i.e., a forest cover or survey strata) of a standards unit area within a Silviculture Prescription (SP) that exceed this number must be spaced. Maximum density is not to be equated with a repression density or stand densities that result in reduced site index. Countable trees - are trees that meet specific height criteria or characteristics, and are tallied in a silviculture survey to determine stand density and maximum density obligations. How to use the Guidelines for Developing Stand Density Management RegimesThe Guidelines provide information on biological, economic, and forest level considerations for stand density management. It also provides a general planning framework for developing and analyzing stand density management regimes and considerations for implementing spacing operations. The following information is intended to help guide the development of stand density management regimes and implementation of the Guidelines: Who should be involved? - regional, district, licensee foresters, Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks (MoELP), and other agencies or groups deemed appropriate by the RM. The RM may require density management regimes to be reviewed with other agencies or groups. Who does the analysis? - may be done by region, district, or licensee staff, but must be consistent with this policy. The analysis must be done in consultation with district and regional staff. How to do the analysis - The most desirable approach for the development of new density management regimes is to carry out full stand and forest level evaluation and analysis of different stand density management regimes. Where possible, the development of stand density management regimes should be integrated with other analyses currently underway (e.g., analyses for Innovative Forest Practices Agreements, Enhanced Forest Management Pilot Projects, Timber Supply Review 2, Forest Level Incremental Silviculture analyses, etc.). In some cases staff time and funding may be limited and preclude a full scale analysis. Regions, districts, and licensees may develop new numbers (best estimates of density management regimes that are appropriate for different areas and conditions) by setting up a series of meetings with appropriate subject matter experts and operational staff. The RM is the statutory decision maker responsible for the specification of any new maximum density numbers and should therefore approve which approach is taken and the assumptions to be used in the development of new numbers. When to start - new stand density management regimes for use in Resource Management Plans and Stand Management Prescriptions, can be developed using the Guidelines and this policy beginning April 1, 1999. The RM should approve the commencement of any initiatives aimed at developing new maximum density numbers. What should be produced - a series of density management regimes and maximum density numbers that are applied on a regional, district, geographic, or licensee-specific area. Maximum density numbers should preferably be based on a management unit basis (i.e., TSA/TFL). However, they may be developed on a management zone, ecosystem, or diversified portfolio basis. Minimum Provincial Stewardship RequirementsThe following forest management issues should be incorporated in the development of stand density management regimes: forest production objectives - high value forest products is the objective unless otherwise specifically identified in existing Woodlot management plans, TFL management plans, or TSA objectives consideration of existing stocking standards - new stand density regimes should be developed with consideration of the forest or product objectives that are embodied in existing minimum and target stocking standards existing higher level plans - stand density regimes that are identified in higher level plans (i.e., Land and Resource Management Plans or Landscape Unit Plans) must be considered in any analysis options and risks - stand density regimes should be developed that maintain options and minimize risks for future generations. Stand density regimes should ensure options are maintained for future harvest ages, species mixes, and forest values. target stocking standard - unless the District Manager (DM) approves otherwise, the target stocking standard should be set at the density of trees at the free growing time period that will achieve the target stand conditions at the specified harvest age minimum stocking standard - unless the DM approves otherwise, minimum stocking standards should be set at a density of trees that considers the entire silviculture regime, including any intermediate interventions, and does not result in significant merchantable volume reductions compared to a stand at the target stocking standard maximum density or upper density limit - should be developed with consideration of the desired target and minimum stocking standards and consistent with analyses done using this policy and the Guidelines How to deal with density management practices on special areasThere may be areas within a management unit that require analysis, evaluation, and selection of stand density management regimes that is different than the stand and forest level process outlined in the Guidelines. Wildlife habitat - consider appropriate wildlife habitat guidance (e.g., guidelines for managing Goshawk, Woodpecker, Mule deer, Caribou, Elk, Grizzly Bear) to develop density management regimes. Any areas that are identified as wildlife habitat areas or Special Management Zones may need to be separately evaluated to select a stand density management regime that adequately maintains or produces desired wildlife habitat conditions. Forage production areas - District Range and MoELP staff should determine any specific density management objectives relating to forage production for livestock and wildlife. Where there are specific goals for livestock Animal Unit Months (AUM) levels and natural wild ungulate levels, density management regimes should be designed to maintain those levels. Understorey biodiversity values - for identified wildlife habitat areas, or areas with general wildlife measures, density management regimes may be designed to produce or maintain the desired biodiversity or habitat conditions Special ecosystems (e.g., Cedar - Hemlock Salal) - there may be specific ecosystems that cannot be adequately evaluated or modelled due to limitations in existing growth and yield information. In these cases, density management regimes should be developed using best available information and discussion with subject matter experts. Partial cutting - for partial cutting in mixed species and all-aged stands, density management regimes should be developed using best available information and discussion with subject matter experts Forest Health - there may be specific forest health conditions that cannot be adequately evaluated using existing growth and yield decision aids. In these cases, density management regimes and practices should be developed using best available information and discussion with subject matter experts. Landscape level forest succession - there may be opportunities to use stand density management to achieve old-growth stand structure objectives. Where there are succession imbalances or limitations in the management unit, density management regimes may be developed that contribute to landscape level objectives. Minimum Forest and Stand Modelling Assumptions and RequirementsThe following are minimum forest and stand modelling assumptions and requirements that
should be included in the development of stand density management regimes: Using the New Stand Density Management RegimesOnce new stand density regimes have been developed, they should be the basis for the maximum density numbers that are included in new SPs. Key points in the specification of a maximum density number:
Height criteria for Countable TreesFree growing surveys tally the number of trees contributing towards the maximum density limit. For clearcut, shelterwood, seed tree, and group selection silvicultural systems, the Silviculture Practices Regulation specifies that the minimum countable height standard is 20% of the median height of the crop trees. For areas prescribed for single tree selection, the minimum countable trees are greater than or equal to 1.3 metres in height and have less than 7.5 cm dbh. The RM may request that Chief Forester consider establishing different characteristics of trees to be counted for the purpose of determining if the maximum stand density has been exceeded. The RM may request the Chief Forester to consider specifying different standards for different silvicultural systems, species combinations, stand types, stand structures, or ingrowth patterns. In submitting a request, the RM should provide accompanying information illustrating the impact of any changes on licensee obligations, total stand density, and the achievement of desired stand, landscape and/or forest level objectives. Note: Changing countable heights can have a similar affect to maximum density obligations as changes to the maximum density number. Different countable height standards should be carefully evaluated in conjunction with any proposed changes to maximum density numbers. Note: Growth and yield (GY) decision aids normally use estimates of total trees/ha and not countable trees/ha. When using growth and yield models to evaluate different stand densities, consider the difference between running a GY simulation that includes a tally of all trees versus a tally that includes only the countable stems per hectare. Implementing Stand Density Management ActivitiesStand density management activities should only be done after careful consideration of the biological, economic, and forest level implications of the treatments and should not compromise the health or long-term value(s) of existing stands. For silviculture prescriptions, only those areas within a standards unit that exceed the specified maximum density must be spaced. These areas must be spaced to within the specified range of maximum and minimum number of trees to be retained. Refer to appropriate guidelines when implementing density management activities to manage forage and habitat for wildlife and livestock. E.g. Guidelines for Maintaining Biodiversity During Juvenile Spacing, Guidelines for Integrating Coastal Grizzly Bear Habitat and Silviculture in Coastal British Columbia. MonitoringEffectiveness audits are used to determine if Code provisions including Regulations, Policy, and Guidelines are effective, and provide the necessary information to manage stand densities. The Forest Practices Branch will work with forest regions, districts, and the MoELP to carry out effectiveness audits of stand density management procedures and requirements. Compliance and enforcement inspections are used to determine if on-the-ground operations have achieved the objectives and standards contained in approved SPs. A review of the effectiveness of stand density management standards should be incorporated in the on-going monitoring and inspection of forest practices. TrainingTraining of Ministry and industry personnel is an ongoing necessity to ensure consistent application of code provisions, analyses, design, and implementation of stand density management regimes. Persons designing stand density management regimes should attend related training courses. ResponsibilitiesChief Forester:
Director, Forest Practices Branch:
Director, Research Branch:
Director, Timber Supply Branch:
Regional Managers:
District Managers:
References
|