[Table of Contents]

20. BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY

ALASKA

Biological diversity is not directly addressed in forest practices legislation. However, provisions for riparian areas and minimum stocking standards may contribute to biological diversity to some degree.

BRITISH COLUMBIA

The District Manager and the Designated Environmental Officer may establish landscape level objectives for biodiversity, including retention of old growth, seral stage distribution, landscape connectivity, species composition, and stand structure and spatial distribution of cut blocks. Development Plans must describe what actions are needed to meet biodiversity objectives including retention of coarse woody debris and wildlife trees. Operational plans must ensure that landscape objectives are achieved.

Management guidelines are in the Biodiversity Guidebook. The management approach is based on the idea that biodiversity will be best maintained by keeping a mosaic of forest (or other vegetation) types similar to those that exist now. Natural Disturbance types (NDT's) are defined based on the biogeoclimatic ecosystem classification. At the landscape level, seral stage distribution, temporal and spatial distribution of cut and leave areas, old growth retention and representativeness, landscape connectivity, stand structure and species composition, are addressed. Stand level recommendations are also provided to address coarse woody debris and wildlife tree management.

CALIFORNIA

Strictly speaking, biological diversity is not addressed in the Forest Practices Rules. However, provisions for watercourse and lake protection zones (WLPZ's), wildlife snags and trees and various items addressed under the cumulative impact assessment contribute to habitat diversity and, in some cases, habitat connectivity.

FINLAND

In June, 1994 the Finnish government confirmed their intent to implement the principles of sustainable forest management. The New Environmental Program for Forestry is Finland's sustainable forest strategy. Future revisions to forest legislation, (i.e. the General Forest Law proposed for 1996), will be based on this strategy and will pertain to all forest ownership groups.

The New Environmental Program designates the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry and the Ministry of Environment as ultimately responsible for monitoring forest biodiversity (Ministries of Agriculture, Forestry, and Environment, 1994). This responsibility will be deferred to the Forest Research Institute and the Forestry Boards for commercial forest areas and the Forest Research Institute, the National Board of Waters and the Environment, and the Forest and Park Service for conservation areas.

The 1994 Forest and Park Service Act includes regulations concerning the conservation of biological diversity and these regulations are now in effect on all state lands. The goal is to create forests that exhibit all stages of succession (Finnish Forest and Park Service, 1994).

The state law requires the preservation and promotion of genetic, species, and habitat diversity (Finnish Forest and Park Service, 1994). The objectives of the law specifically call for the preservation of threatened species in commercial forests and the protection of habitats of key species.

Nine key biotopes have been identified as critical to the survival of Finland's endangered species and special requirements govern forest activities in these habitats. The management of the biotopes can focus on special treatments for individual trees, groups of trees or other existing vegetation. State forest requirements include:

Protection of rare and endangered species is also recommended to private forest owners by the National Forestry Centres (National Extension Service, 1994). They suggest private forest owners set aside forest edges, eskers, rocky outcrops, virgin peatlands, wetlands, shorelines, small water courses, highlands, nesting trees and the immediate surrounding area of birds of prey, and habitats of endangered species. If forestry does occur in these sensitive areas, several guidelines apply:

The concept of multi-objective forest management planning has been adopted, and a new forest planning database has been developed for private forests. The system will begin operation in 1995 and will permit a more specific description of forest stands and their biological diversity. The new planning technique will further serve the purpose of landscape planning in privately owned forests (J. Heino, pers. comm.).

The Nature Conservation Act protects flora and fauna and decrees the establishment of nature conservation areas. Legislated in 1923, Finland's Nature Conservation Act is one of the world's oldest conservation Acts (J. Heino, pers. comm.). A proposal for the total reformation of the Nature Conservation Act is currently being prepared. The proposal should be complete by March, 1995 (J. Heino, pers. comm.).

GERMANY

Federal Republic of Germany

The goals and basic principles of forestry planning outlined in Section 6 of the Federal Forest Act promote biological diversity in Germany's forests. The goals and principles include:

In addition, the general definition of appropriate forestry requires,

The Environmental Administration, guided by the Nature Preservation Law, is attempting to increase biological diversity over the entire land base by changing some general land management procedures. For example, the administration is encouraging land owners to establish natural area corridors and manage them specifically as species habitats. Land owners are also being encouraged to leave unmanaged strips of vegetation along roads. The States are using subsidies to persuade land owners to comply with the environmental administrations wishes.

Germany faces a dilemma not yet experienced by North America. The entire German land base has been intensely managed for centuries. During a portion of this time forest management focussed on increased timber production and the introduction of exotic tree species that would meet this economic objective. The forests that resulted from this management focus were unnatural, and, for the most part, not sustainable without continued intensive management.

Today, forest management stresses natural processes, native species, and a diversity of structure and lifeform. However, because of the highly altered landscapes, attaining this goal still requires intensive management and long-term planning.

Baden-Wurttemberg

Section 14 of the Forest Law requires forest management to maintain and build biological health and Section 32 allows the designation of protection forests for areas with a special function for biodiversity. Banned forests are designated under Section 32.

There are two types of banned forests. The first excludes all activities, except research. These banned forests will proceed unmanaged through their successional stages and will become Baden-Wurttemberg's future old-growth areas, rich in biological diversity. The second type of banned forest allows management practices that will direct the development of the forest (e.g. to retain a successional stage necessary for an endangered species).

The objective of state forest planning is to produce mixed forests of natural species. Private forest owners are offered subsidies to follow the state forest example. The forest management goal is to increase biological diversity over the entire forest land base.

Bavaria

Biodiversity is considered in the Nature Preservation Law for the protection of native and endangered species as well as in the principles for sustainable management outlined in Article 14. In all state forests, rare species are protected by favouring the growth of rare and endangered flora, preserving most biotopes, and extensively managing dry habitats (Brinkmann, pers. comm.).

Bavaria has declared 135 natural or near-natural forest reserves (total of 4,400 ha). The natural forests are excluded from any utilization other than research focussed on observing natural forest development. Near-natural forests have been declared as nature and landscape protection reserves.

Natural and near-natural forests protected by Article 11 of the Forest Law are set aside to ensure future biodiversity.

NOVA SCOTIA

To address biodiversity concerns, the Forest/Wildlife Guidelines require that 3 to 8% of managed forest areas should contain old growth trees. Clearcut areas should not exceed 50 ha, and smaller cuts made more often would provide a better distribution of the shrub-sapling successional stage (Forest/Wildlife Guidelines, 1988:6).

ONTARIO

Ontario will adopt the National Biodiversity Strategy. The Policy Framework for Sustainable Forests includes conservation of biological diversity in the use of forest ecosystems as a principle and directs forest management to be consistent with these principles. Biological diversity is addressed at the provincial, regional or landscape management unit, and stand levels.

Under the Crown Forests Sustainability Act, biological diversity must be conserved in forest ecosystems (FMPM, 1994:viii). Biodiversity indicators will be designed, and used to assess sustainability on the forest management unit.

OREGON

Biological diversity is not directly addressed under the Forest Practices Act. On state-managed lands, the trend away from clearcutting and away from conversion to young, managed stands is promoting biodiversity.

Also, clearcutting restrictions, RMA's and green-up requirements provide some vegetation and habitat diversity.

Over half of the forest lands in Oregon are under the jurisdiction of the USFS and BLM. Assuming that Alternative 9 (of the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact on Management for Late Successional and Old Growth Forest Related Species Within the Range of the Northern Spotted Owl), known as the President's Plan, is in fact adopted, most of these lands will be managed with a priority for biodiversity.

SWEDEN

A primary tool for managing biodiversity is the retention of key habitats, "areas which support or may be expected to support threatened, rare, or care-demanding species (Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, 1994 p.93)". The National Forestry Board is developing descriptions of key habitats and mapping them with the aid of a geographical information system (GIS) (S. Sohlberg, pers. comm.). Key habitats are marked for protection before final harvesting occurs.

To date, the protection of key habitats has been based on the potential for biological diversity, rather than actual assessments of biodiversity. No systematic inventories of biodiversity at the species or with-in species levels have been conducted in the key-habitat areas (Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, 1994 p.94).

The National Forestry Board has introduced several additional regulations and mechanisms to ensure the protection of biodiversity, and the principles of the UNCED's Agenda 21 declaration have been used to develop Sweden's biodiversity policy in forest planning (S. Sohlberg, pers. comm.).

Sweden's larger forest companies are introducing a new forest planning concept to promote biodiversity. The companies are conducting trials of ecological landscape planning over areas ranging from 10,000 to 20,000 ha in size (Baltscheffsky, 1993). The aim of landscape planning is to ensure the survival of all species dependent on the ecosystem by linking extensive areas of valuable natural habitat with corridors of undisturbed forest. It is hoped that ecological landscape planning will be fully in place within 10 years. It is also hoped that this type of planning will be applied to all types of land ownership.

The Swedish Environmental Protection Agency has developed a strategy for sustainable development. The strategy, which stresses the importance of preservation of biodiversity in forests contains a forest action program (Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, 1993).

Extra measures to be taken in areas to receive special environmental consideration (montane forests, wet forests (swamp forests) and high grade deciduous forests).

Other proposals of the action program for forestry include;

The Strategy for Sustainable Development, was submitted to the Swedish Government in June 1993.

TASMANIA

Maintaining biodiversity is dependent on the maintenance of habitat, enhancing opportunities for recolonization of cut over areas and by linking uncut areas to allow genetic interchange, and is a primary concern to Forestry Tasmania (FPC, 1993:4). In Tasmania, conservation of biological (environmental) diversity is principally catered for in a systematic Crown land reserve system at the Nature Conservation region level, and/or by management prescription in production forestry (FPC, 1993:5, 53).

On Crown forests and private forest lands proposed for fauna maintenance, planning will include consideration of dispersed logging, wildlife habitat strips, wildlife priority areas, streamside reserves, and pest, weed and disease control. On private land, rare and endangered species will be dealt with according to part V(a) of the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1970. The Minister may enter into conservation covenants, and the landowner may apply for compensation (FPC, 1993:5). Conservation of genetic resources and variety will be by habitat protection, and species and seed selection provisions (FPC, 1993:5). When forested lands are converted to agricultural use, remnant patches of forest vegetation should be included to provide wildlife habitat, erosion control, and shade or windbreak (FPC, 1993:5).

UNITED KINGDOM

Biodiversity is currently dealt with as a policy objective by the Nature Conservation Guideline, and certain requirements must be met when carrying out forest operations. A biodiversity guideline for the forestry commission is under preparation (Bell, pers. comm.). Long term retention areas are managed to promote old growth, as are Ancient Semi-Natural Woods, where a set of management guides are developed to provide a suitable silvicultural system for management.

U.S. FOREST SERVICE (REGION 6)

The Forest Service is required under the provisions of NFMA to recognize and accommodate biological diversity in forest planning and management. Protection of biological diversity is an especially important objective for those federal lands covered by the ROD.

VICTORIA STATE

Biological diversity is addressed at the Forest Management Area planning level to ensure maintenance of the floral and faunal diversity of native forests including a range of successional stages on public lands (Code, 1989:7), and by planning coupe siting and design to ensure the maintenance of a mosaic of vegetation age classes (Code, 1989:14). Old growth and biological diversity studies are utilized to aid in the planning process, and old growth management areas are established under a joint Federal/State agreement (Leonard, pers. comm.).

WASHINGTON

Biodiversity is not directly addressed in the forest practices legislation, as, for example, it is on National Forest Lands. Some biodiversity concerns are addressed through provisions for stream, wetland, shoreline or wildlife protection.

WESTERN AUSTRALIA

Biodiversity (including old growth) is an objective of the Code of Logging Practice. It is also considered under the Ten Year Forest Management Plan and is planned for within ecological reserves, streamside reserves, and national parks (Clarke, pers. comm.).
Return to top Return Forward