| Timber Supply Analyses | Socio-economic Analyses | Summaries of Public Input | Rationale Statements | | TSR Homepage |

PRINCE GEORGE TSA

SOCIO-ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

March 1995

Executive Summary

Introduction

Area Description

Community Profile

Prince George Forest District

Vanderhoof Forest District

Fort St. James Forest District

First Nations

First Nations issues include:

Environmental Profile

Economic Profile

Guide Outfitting

Commercial Fisheries

Sport Fishery

Tourism and Outdoor Recreation

Agriculture

Economic Profile - Forestry

TSA Land Base

TSA Harvest

Forest Industry Employment and Economic Value

Harvest Scenarios

Implications of Timber Harvest Scenarios

Table E.1: Prince George TSA Impacts

Scenario 1
Scenario 2
Scenario 3
CURRENT
Decades
1-20
CURRENT
Decades
1-5
Decades
6-20
CURRENT
Decades
1-20
Harvest
(m3)
9,073,661
9,630,000
9,073,661
10,162,500
9,630,000
9,073,661
7,650,000
Variation
556,339
1,088,839
-532,500
-1,423,661
Economic Impacts
Employment (PY) Direct
5,807
6,163
5,807
6,504
6,163
5,807
4,896
Indirect/
Induced
5,226
5,547
5,226
5,854
5,547
5,226
4,406
Total
11,034
11,710
11,034
12,358
11,710
11,034
9,302
Variation
676
1,324
-648
-1,732
Employment Income
(1993 $mil.)
Direct
$203.5
$215.9
$203.5
$227.9
$215.9
$203.5
$171.5
Indirect/
Induced
$123.6
$131.2
$123.6
$138.5
$131.2
$123.6
$104.3
Total
$327.1
$347.2
$327.1
$366.4
$347.2
$327.1
$275.8
Variation
$20.1
$39.3
-$19.2
-$51.3

a. After-tax income

Table E.2: Summary of Provincial Impacts (includes TSA Impacts)

TSA
Scenario 1 Impacts
Scenario 2 Impacts
Scenario 3 Impacts
CURRENT
Decades
1-20
CURRENT
Decades
1-5
Decades 6-20
CURRENT
Decades
1-20
Harvest (m3)
9,073,661
9,630,000
9,073,661
10,162,500
9,630,000
9,073,661
7,650,000
Variation
556,339
1,088,839
-532,500
-1,423,661
Economic Impacts
Employment (PY)Direct
5,952
6,317
5,952
6,667
6,317
5,952
5,018
Indirect/Induced
8,928
9,476
8,928
10,000
9,476
8,928
7,528
Total
14,881
15,793
14,881
16,667
15,793
14,881
12,546
Variation
912
1,786
-874
-2,335
Employment Income
(1993 $mil.)
Direct
$211.0
$223.9
$211.0
$236.3
$223.9
$211.0
$177.9
Indirect/Induced
$211.2
$224.2
$211.2
$236.6
$224.2
$211.2
$178.1
Total
$422.2
$448.1
$422.2
$472.9
$448.1
$422.2
$356.0
Variation
$25.9
$50.7
-$25.9
-$66.5
Provincial Government Revenue ($mil/year)
Royalties and Stumpage
$280.9
$298.1
$280.9
$314.6
$298.1
$280.9
$236.8
Personal Income Tax
$46.1
$48.9
$46.1
$51.6
$48.9
$46.1
$38.8
Other Taxes
$53.5
$56.8
$53.5
$60.0
$56.8
$53.5
$45.1
Total
$380.5
$403.8
$380.5
$426.2
$403.8
$380.5
$320.8
Variation
$23.3
$30.3
-$22.3
-$59.7
Federal Government Revenue ($mil/year)
$100.4
$106.5
100.4
$112.4
$106.5
$100.4
$84.6

Table E.3 Summary of Non-Timber Prince George TSA Impacts Scenario 1 and 2

Scenario 1
Scenario 2
Community Impacts Maintains or increases industry operations from present levels. Increases industry operations from present levels.
Helps maintain production levels as temporary wood supplies are phased out. Helps maintain production levels as temporary wood supplies are phased out.
Could help offset the impact of reduced fibre supplies from other sources,within and outside of the TSA. Could help offset the impact of reduced fibre supplies from other sources, within and outside of the TSA.
Guide Outfitting More risk to game populations from increased road access for hunters. More risk to game populations from increased road access for hunters, and habitat change.
TrappingIncreased impact on old-growth dependent species. Greatest impact on old-growth
dependent species, e.g., pine marten.
FisheriesIncreased potential for habitat
damage and increased user access that may lead to over-fishing.
Most potential for habitat damage and increased user access.
Outdoor Recreation and Tourism Higher potential for negative impact on aesthetic values.

No clear choice between scenarios because many local residents involved in outdoor recreation and also employed directly or indirectly by the forest industry. Road access to new recreation opportunities may balance impacts of timber harvesting.

Agriculture Minimal impact; may increase availability of Crown rangeland for grazing.
First Nations Increased opportunity for involvement in forest industry.

Concern about negative impacts on traditional and ecological integrity of forest land.

Increased opportunity for involvement in forest industry.

Concern about negative impacts on traditional and ecological integrity of forest land.

Environment Increased pressure on environmental values and wildlife habitat. Greatest pressure on environmental values and wildlife habitat.

Fastest conversion of older age stands to second growth stands.

Table E.3 Summary of Non-Timber Prince George TSA Impacts Scenario 3

Scenario 3
Community Impacts Estimated direct job loss of approximately 910 PYs employment in the TSA.
Estimated indirect/induced job loss of 820 PYs, primarily in the Prince George area.

Total estimated TSA job loss of 1730 PYs (direct and indirect/induced).

May threaten the viability of some smaller communities with single mill operations
Guide Outfitting Lower harvests provide greater flexibility to retain wilderness and may reduce or slow road development.
TrappingReduced impacts of harvesting on trapping activity and target species that are old-growth dependent.
FisheriesReduced risk of negative impacts on fisheries:
-less potential for habitat damage
-less short-term increase in user access to fisheries, thus less risk of over-fishing
Outdoor Recreation and Tourism Less potential for deterioration of aesthetic quality of fishing and outdoor recreation experiences; greater flexibility to retain wilderness environment in certain areas and maintain this tourism amenity.
Agriculture Minimal impact.
First Nations Less potential for negative impact on traditional and ecological integrity of forest land.

Greater competition for wood fibre will make new forest industry development more difficult.

Environment Less environmental impact and more flexibility to protect areas like old-growth habitat.


Return to top