Queen Charlotte Islands, Summary of Public Input

Socio-Economic Analysis

Concern over logging and processing jobs for islands residents, short- and long-term stability, and the level of the allowable annual cut dominate the comments on socio-economic issues. Timber West, in particular, questions certain statements in the Socio-Economic Analysis. It contends:

• employment income calculations net of taxes underestimated the benefit to the province

• job losses would not be significantly offset by Forest Renewal BC, the South Moresby Forestry Replacement Account and the Gwaii Trust

• forest industry employment, stated in person-years, underestimated the number of workers and families involved

• indirect and induced employment were also underestimated

• Level of allowable annual cut/community stability

The allowable annual cut and its influence on community stability is discussed in 32 submissions. Of these, 31 recommend that the cut be reduced to a sustainable level, with several asking that the long-term harvest level be reached in less than five years. These writers cite long-term concerns and the concept of "intergenerational equity" as their rationale. One writer suggests the allowable annual cut be increased. This individual cites short-term economic and employment problems, especially in and around Masset.