![]() |
| You are here: | Home > Growth and Yield Modelling > PrognosisBC > Features & Functions |
![]() |
PrognosisBC
|
|
Model Features
|
|
|
|
|
In addition to its ability to project complex stands, a further
strength of the model is its ability to simulate almost
any form of harvest or thinning, from clearcutting to partial cutting.
These thinnings can be carried out from above, below, or by
diameter class; with or without species retention preferences.
Entries can be scheduled as single or repeated events, by either
calendar year or when stand conditions match a state specified by the user.
The model is best used for projecting existing stands from a ground-based inventory, though it can also initiate and project a stand from bare ground conditions, and a prototype regeneration model can now be invoked. Three hardwood species: aspen, birch and cottonwood, are included in this new release, addressing a shortcoming of Version 2.0. More information about new features can be found on this page.
How PrognosisBC Works
|
| Factor | Assumption | Impact |
| Spatial location | The model does not account for the effects of tree location in the stand (evenly spaced vs. clumped) on stand development. Under similar conditions, the model will project the same yields for stands with evenly spaced, clumped, and/or randomly spaced trees. | No impact |
| Crown ratio | Trees with long crowns grow faster than trees with short crowns. | High ratio = increased growth |
| Relative size (indicator of canopy position) | A tree's vigour will improve if its canopy position improves (i.e., when larger trees are removed). | Increase in relative size = increase in growth |
| Stand density | While trees in an open stand grow faster, the overall volume/hectare may be lower than that of a denser stand with less growth per individual tree. | Increase in stand density = decrease in tree growth |
| Thinning | Thinning response is a function of the reduction in stand density and whether the relative size of the residual tree changes as a result of thinning. | Increase in relative size of residual tree and/or reduction in stand density = increase in tree growth |
PrognosisBC is based on sub-models that predict diameter growth, height growth, crown development, mortality, and regeneration for individual trees. The sequence of calculation steps is shown below.
The core USFS Forest Vegetation Simulator growth and yield model has been extended by numerous modules that make it possible to simulate the effects of fire, pests, and disease. Of these extensions, only the Western Root Disease model has been formally implemented in the PrognosisBC system. A prototype implementation of the Fire and Fuels Extension (FFE) has been adapted from the Northern Idaho variant and is available for research purposes. A prototype environmental indicators extension - PrognosisEI - was also developed in the late 1990s and completed in 1999. Users interested in finding out more about the additional capabilities of PrognosisBC should refer to this page and contact the Support Centre for more information: PrognosisBC Support or call toll-free at 1.866.515.3772.
Initial root disease conditions may be based on: tree inventory damage codes; residual inoculum found in stumps; approximate densities of infected and uninfected trees inside root disease patches; and information on the number, size, and location of disease patches in a stand.
The growth and shrinkage of disease patches is modelled using a separate simulation of the movement of the infection front into other areas of disease-free trees. The details of pathogen behaviour can be tailored to local conditions. To represent the persistence of inoculum following a clearcut harvest, a separate simulation at a finer time scale is used to model the transfer of inoculum to young trees in the regeneration phase.
The extension also simulates the effects of windthrow events and of four types of bark beetles known to interact with root disease: those that depend on density of susceptible stems, windfalls, or on the density and location of root-disease-infected stems.
More information about the Western Root Disease model can be found on this page
Linked to Prognosis, the FFE model consists of 3 main components: live trees, fuels, and fire effects. Prognosis maintains the live trees and simulates their natural growth, mortality, and the impacts of silvicultural activities. The FFE tracks snags (standing dead trees) and woody debris (logs or tree parts on the ground). Snags are created through stand management or tree mortality. As the snags age, they lose their crown, break, and fall down to become woody debris. Woody debris is also created through crown loss from live trees and debris from management actions. This dead organic matter decays over time, with rates that are dependent on the size and type of material, and site-dependent factors. As well as all the standard management that is part of Prognosis, the FFE contains specific options for managing snags and woody debris, such as salvage logging or mechanical treatments.
The FFE simulates fire behaviour and effects such as fuel consumption, crowning, tree mortality and smoke production. Users may choose to simulate the effect of the fire in the stand. In this case, the model will simulate the consumption of woody debris and crowns, trees killed by fire, and production of smoke. As a result of these events the stand structure will be changed. Alternatively, the FFE can predict the potential effect of two different types of fire. In this case, the model will produce output on the potential mortality, fuel consumption, smoke production, and will produce indices of crowning potential.
More information about the Fire and Fuels Extension can be found on this page
PrognosisEI combines the forecast stand conditions from PrognosisBC with other ecological data to project future environmental values. Timber and environmental projections are reported as plain text files that can be exported to customized ArcView tools for spatial analysis and automated display of maps and graphs.
The first case-study application of PrognosisEI was a 3,300 hectare watershed-level study in the West Arm Demonstration Forest near Nelson, BC. Model behaviour was tested in twelve alternative scenarios that included no management, large clearcuts, partial cuts, and patch cuts. Case study findings showed that the model indicators, representing a wide range of stand- and watershed-level timber and non-timber values, were responsive to scenario differences.
More information about PrognosisEI can be found on this page
| Region | Zone | Extension | Study | Contact |
| Cariboo | IDF,SBPS | FFE | Predicting Mountain Pine Beetle Impacts on lodgepole pine stands and woody debris characteristics in a mixed severity fire regime | Brad Hawkes |
| Cariboo | IDF | . | Impacts of three partial-cutting regimes for mule deer winter range on timber flow | Barry Snowdon |
| Kamloops, Nelson | MS, ICH, IDF | WRD | Impacts of different levels of root disease on stand development | John Muir |
| Nelson | ICH | WRD,FFE | Case study with PrognosisEI in the West Arm Demonstration Forest | PrognosisEI ESSA Technologies Ltd. |
| Nelson | IDF, ESSF, ICH, MS | WRD | Impact of partial cutting options on yield at the stand and forest level | John Pollack |
| Nelson | IDFdm2, ICHmk1, ICHmw1, MSdk | . | Development of analysis unit yield curves for timber supply analysis using stand tables developed from inventory audit samples which provided crown ratio and diameter increment data | David
Carson Timberline Forest Inventory Consultants |
| Prince George | SBS | . | Impact of selection management on yield using a local calibration of PrognosisBC | Craig Farnden |
|
Last Modified: 2008 MAR 12. Ministry Contact: Mario di Lucca Webmaster: For.Prodres@gov.bc.ca |