Forest Productivity Council PolicyDEFINITION AND ESTIMATION OF TOP HEIGHT FOR SITE INDEX3.0 Potential Top Height Definitions3.1 Option 1 - Top Height 1998: One largest diameter tree per 0.01 ha plot
The tree height and age must be such that the extant height-age curve can be applied validly. This excludes young and old stands. For instance, most of the currently accepted B.C. Ministry of Forests height-age curves do not work well below 20 years (bh) or above 100 years (bh). Unless the curves can be shown to operate outside these bounds, these restrictions apply. This definition does not preclude measuring heights for other purposes. The primary aims are to ensure that trees selected as top height trees can be used to validly estimate site index and that site index is estimated in an unambiguous, consistent, unbiased fashion. 3.2 Option 2 - Top Height 1995: one largest tree per 0.01 ha plot (TH95)This option entails adopting the VRI definition of top height as the Ministry standard. This definition is:
Option 2 is similar to Option 1 except that Option 2 allows the next largest diameter suitable tree (in some cases dead and/or down trees) to be selected if the largest diameter tree is not suitable. Also, Option 2 is not explicitly restricted to valid site index trees. 3.3 Option 3 - Top Height 1997: Four Trees per 0.04 ha Plot (TH97)This is the majority option proposed by the Technical Top Height Committee (established by the Resources Inventory Branch in 1996).
3.4 Option 4 Status QuoThis option is simply to maintain the status quo, which involves using different definitions for different applications. These are summarized in Table 2. Table 2. Current top height definitions used in different applications.
Last updated: 01/13/99 |