Sitka Spruce Weevil Hazard Decision Tool for Vancouver Island
|
Additional Information
|
Example:
your degree day sum is 890 =
baseline hazard is moderate to
high
|
|
Site 1 (reduced hazard compared to baseline)
|
Site 2 (increased hazard compared to baseline)
|
|
imperfectly drained
|
warm aspect
|
|
in the fog belt
|
CWHxm1 or CWHvm1
|
|
plant at 1600 sph
|
very rich
|
|
|
well-drained
|
|
|
Site series CWHxm1/06-08 or CWHvm1/07
|
|
hazard will decrease
expect annual attack rates around 20%,
moderate
|
hazard will increase
expect annual attack rates of at least 40%,
high
|
Degree days
Weevils need to accumulate at least 888 degree days above 7.2ºC to grow and
successfully reproduce in Sitka spruce leaders. Approximately 100 larvae feeding
will kill an average leader – if only a few weevils attack, it may recover.
Observations specific to Vancouver Island show a lower degree days threshold.
Other site factors must be considered too, since they affect the actual leader
temperature, which limits weevil growth and development.
Severity
Attack rate can be % of trees attacked, either annually, cumulatively, or
another index. Attack rate is strongly correlated with attack severity. Attack
severity categorizes the impact on a stand in terms of growth form and volume or
height loss. Trees that have been attacked only once or a few times by the time
they reach 15-20 m tall often recover and have straight boles with no visible
defects. This is especially true for hypermaritime subzones and the cooler fog
belt areas of northern Vancouver Island.
BEC -
Biogeoclimatic ecosystem classification unit
BEC variants can quite variable climatically, even though sites within a variant
are more similar than sites across variants. Most environmental variation within
a BEC variant is captured at the site series level. Sitka spruce is generally
suitable on moister, richer site series. Microsite conditions strongly affect
weevil hazard as well by influencing the leader and the forest floor, where the
weevil overwinters. The CWHvm1 had especially high environmental and climatic
variability and also a wide range of attack rates.
Fog belt
Sites in the fog belt have lower attack rates because the cooling effect reduces
the actual number of degree days compared to that predicted by the model.
Ss leader
position
Leader temperature is a key factor, since it limits weevil development. Exposed
leaders accumulate degree days faster than predicted by the model for the site –
some studies show they are 5-10 degrees warmer than the ground surface. Shading
reduces degree day accumulation. It also reduces leader vigour and growth, but
Sitka spruce stands regenerating under a canopy (e.g., alder) have much less
weevil attack, possibly for these reasons.
Overstorey
Retaining a deciduous (alder, cottonwood) overstorey has been shown to
substantially reduce weevil attack rates, while allowing the Sitka spruce to put
on height increment in the spring and fall while the canopy is relatively open.
The deciduous overstorey can be managed as a shelterwood, and removed once the
spruce grow taller than 12-15 m. Sitka spruce may suffer from competition under
a coniferous overstorey.
SNR - Soil
nutrient regime
Very rich sites have far higher attack rates than nutrient-poor or medium sites.
Fertilized sites also have higher attack rates for this reason: thicker leaders
can support more weevils and more offspring.
Mineral soil
depth
Sites with deeper mineral soil had more weevil attack; depth corresponds roughly
with site nutrition. Deeper, richer soils support more nutritious, thicker
leaders.
Organic soil
depth
Sites that have shallower litter (LFH) or organic horizons have slightly more
attack. This depends on the substrate and drainage, but in richer sites with
higher rates of nutrient cycling (e.g., sites with Moder to Mull humus) the
litter layer thickness reflects a richer site. On the other hand, sites with
deeper organic horizons (e.g., Om, Of, Oh) are poorly drained and have low
attack rates.
Drainage
Sites with imperfect drainage have lower attack rates than sites that are well-
or moderately well-drained. This may be because the substrate is not suitable
for weevils, or because of the lower vigour and smaller size of leaders. Check
for gleying or mottling in soil horizons during the growing season, high water
table during the fall and winter, sphagnum moss, or other plant indicators of
seasonally fluctuating and high water tables.
Sitka spruce
height
Sitka spruce trees between 2 and 18 m tall are most susceptible to attack, which
peaks around 10-12 m. This age range corresponds roughly to 5-20 years. Leaders
on younger trees are too small, and older trees are too tall for weevils to
crawl up and reach the leader after overwintering in the forest floor duff.
Density
Increasing stand density (including regeneration density) above 1250 sph reduces
attack rates somewhat – consider keeping density at or above 1600 sph to
maintain full stocking and reduce weevil hazard. This density can include spruce
stems, total stems, regeneration, or total stand density.
CWD - Coarse woody debris
Sites with >40% coarse woody debris covering the ground had less attack. There
are several possible explanations: these sites often had less developed forest
floors, large abundant CWD may also physically obstruct soil weathering, or soil
acidity may increase as CWD decays.
Aspect
Warm aspect (135º-285 º) sites had only a small increase in weevil attack rates.
The effect depends on slope and exposure.
Indicator plants
Some indicator plant species showed consistent trends with attack, but be aware
that species cover varies with geographic area and stand age and density.
|
Indicator plant species
|
Observed indicator value for weevil hazard
|
|
Increasing with higher site hazard
|
|
salmonberry
|
·
Richer sites
|
|
horsetail
|
·
Richer sites, well-drained
|
|
invasive or weedy pioneer species:
grasses, western buttercup, Scotch broom
|
·
Relatively recent disturbance
·
Nutrient-medium sites
·
Moderately-well drained
|
|
Oregon
beaked moss
|
·
Longer time since disturbance
·
Moderately well to well drained sites
|
|
|
|
|
Decreasing with higher site hazard
|
|
salal
|
·
More acidic soils / Mor humus
·
Poorer sites
|
|
rushes
|
·
Imperfect drainage
|
|
lanky moss
|
·
Nutrient-poor sites
·
More acidic soils / Mor humus
|
|
oval-leaved blueberry
|
·
Mor to Moder humus
·
Poorer to nutrient-medium sites
·
Moderately well to well drained sites
|
|
swordfern
|
·
Mor to Moder humus
·
Poorer to nutrient-medium sites
·
Less frequent with poor drainage
|
|
fireweed
|
·
Recent disturbance / exposed mineral soil
·
More frequent with richer sites
·
More frequent in well-drained sites
|
Ministry contact: Jodie Krakowski
Please direct questions regarding webpage to For.Prodres@gov.bc.ca
Updated April 2009 |