The State of BC’s Forests
The Indicators
Jobs and communities — PDF print version
Indicator 18 – Jobs and communities

click graphic to enlarge
Why is this important?
Forests provide a major source of employment and income for many of B.C.’s
communities.
Overview
- Forest-based jobs support individual workers, their families, and the
economic and social fabric of their communities. Worker safety is a vital
aspect of maintaining this support.
- Many of British Columbia’s rural and First Nations communities are
dependent on forest-based employment.
- Since 1970, employment in the forest sector has been fairly stable while
the province’s economy grew and diversified. Provincial dependence on the
forest sector has decreased, but many areas are still highly dependent.
|
STATE |

mixed |
 |
TREND |

mixed |
 |
INFORMATION |

adequate |
Questions about jobs and communities
Related indicators
- Changes in technology and market demands affect employment in the
forests and related manufacturing (see Timber harvest,
Forest products).
- Employment and community stability affects government revenues and
expenses (see Management capacity).
- Management responses include policy changes (see
Law).
Indicator 18-1
How many jobs rely on B.C.’s forests?

larger versions – HTML | PDF
| Excel
Why is this important?
A significant portion of the province’s jobs depend on B.C.’s forests.
State and Trend
- Forest-based industries include harvesting and processing of timber,
cattle ranching, nature-based tourism and non-timber forest products.
- Direct employment in these
industries averaged about 120,000 jobs since 1970, fluctuating with changing
product demand, increasing productivity, a changing mix of products and
services, and contracting26.
- Indirect employment in
industries that support the forest-based industries was estimated at 60,000
additional jobs in 2004.
- Direct forest-based employment accounted for 6% of total employment in
B.C. in 2000. Direct and indirect employment accounted for 9%.
- From 1987 onward, timber-based industries averaged about 93,000 jobs, or
80% of forest-based jobs. Mechanization in sawmills in the early 1980s, and
pulp and paper mill closures and modernization in the late 1990s, reduced
employment while the timber harvest increased.
- Direct employment in cattle ranching averaged about 7,000 jobs, or 6% of
forest-based jobs, but decreased to about 5,000 jobs in 2004.
- Direct employment in nature-based commercial tourism that relies on
forests (e.g., hunting, fishing, wildlife viewing and backcountry hiking)
averaged an estimated 17,000 jobs (15%), and trend varied by activity.
- Maps: (none)
Information
Indicator 18-2
How much income is based on B.C.’s forests?

larger versions – HTML | PDF
| Excel
Why is this important?
Income based on forests supports many of B.C.’s workers, their families and
communities.
State and Trend
- Forest-based labour income is earned through direct employment in
forest-based industries and indirect employment in service industries that
support the forest-based industries.
- In 2000, direct and indirect forest-based labour income was $6.57
billion, or about 10% of the provincial labour income from all industries.
- Timber industries (forestry, logging, lumber, panels, pulp and paper)
accounted for $4.27 billion (92% of direct forest-based income).
- Non-timber industries (cattle ranching and nature-based tourism)
accounted for $0.38 billion (8% of direct forest-based income). Images of
forests are also important to the rest of the tourism industry.
- Average income in forest-based industries was $38,400, 20% higher than
the $31,900 in all industries. It was highest in pulp and paper ($57,500),
followed by wood manufacturing ($41,800), logging ($38,400), nature-based
tourism ($16,900) and cattle ranching ($16,700).
- Between 1991 and 2004, average weekly earnings adjusted for inflation
increased about 10% in forestry and wood manufacturing, and decreased about
5% in pulp and paper and nature-based tourism.
- Maps:
Wood-processing mills (PDF)
Information
- Labour income statistics for 2000 are from the 2001 census.
- Reliable data are not available for labour income from harvesting NTFPs.
The work is generally seasonal and few people identify this as their primary
employment. Earnings vary greatly, as do skills and experience.
- References:
2001 Census,
Survey of Labour and Income Dynamics
- Related international and national indicators: MP
6.5.b; CCFM 5.3.6
Indicator 18-3
How dependent on forests are B.C.’s communities?

larger versions – HTML | PDF
| Excel
Why is this important?
Many B.C. communities depend on a strong local forest industry for their
economic and social well-being.
State and Trend
- Community sustainability depends on many factors such as income,
diversity of income sources, potential for and proximity to alternative
employment, amenity values and leadership in addressing change.
- Timber-based industries supported community sustainability with around
10% of the provincial gross domestic product (GDP) in the late 1980s. By the
early 2000s, their GDP increased by about one quarter. However, with
diversification and faster growth in the rest of the provincial economy,
their share of provincial GDP decreased to about 7%29.
- The sale of most forest-based goods and services provides
basic income30
that flows into a community, pays resident employees, and creates other
local jobs as the money circulates within the community.
- Many B.C. communities obtain a high proportion of their basic income
from timber-based industries. In 2001, 35 of 63 local areas31
(excluding greater Vancouver) obtained 20% to 57% of their basic income from
the timber and tourism industries. These areas include 48 communities with a
total population of 350,000, not including surrounding rural areas.
- The map of forest sector vulnerability shows relative sensitivities of
the 63 local-area economies to downturns in timber-based industries.
- Many of the most vulnerable communities are in areas where future timber
supplies are at risk due to the mountain pine beetle epidemic.
- Maps: Dominant Income (PDF),
Local Timber Supply Forecast (PDF)
Information
Indicator 18-4
How many injuries and fatalities occur in the forest sector?

larger versions – HTML | PDF
| Excel
Why is this important?
Injuries and fatalities disrupt workers’ lives, families and communities, and
reduce the forest sector’s productivity and ability to attract skilled workers.
State and Trend
- Injuries and fatalities result from dangerous situations, equipment
failure, cultural attitudes, market and workplace pressures, company and
government policies, human error and other factors (fatigue, dehydration,
inadequate conditioning, stress, drugs and alcohol).
- The forest sector’s number of fatalities has generally decreased over
the past 35 years, but its number of fatalities is still the second highest
of all sectors (the transportation sector is highest). The number of
fatalities for other industries has increased over the past 20 years.
- The number of injuries reported in the forest sector has decreased since
the 1970s. No clear trend is apparent for the sum of all other sectors.
- Small operations, employing 20 or fewer workers, employ 50% of forestry
workers and experience 70% of fatalities and 67% of serious injuries in the
forest sector.
- Annual, inflation-adjusted benefits paid out for disability and
fatalities from 1991 to 2004, inclusive, averaged $128 million (in 2004
dollars) for the forest industry and $522 million for all other industries.
Benefits paid per worker in the forest industry were almost four times those
paid in all other industries ($1,149 and $306 per person-year,
respectively).
- Maps: (none)
Information
|
| Previous | Next |
The State of British Columbia’s Forests – 2006 |