The State of BC’s Forests
The Indicators
Timber harvest — PDF print version
Indicator 13 – Timber harvest

click graphic to enlarge
Why is this important?
Timber harvests have direct implications for environmental integrity and
sustainable economic activity.
Overview
- This indicator examines timber volume; for area harvested and economic
importance, see the indicators Ecosystem dynamics,
Forest products, and Jobs and
communities.
- Timber harvests supported much of British Columbia’s economic
development, and continue to be important to the province’s economy.
- Provincial harvest levels are projected to be higher over the next
decade as a response to the current mountain pine beetle epidemic, followed
by compensating decreases.
|
STATE |

good |
 |
TREND |

mixed |
 |
INFORMATION |

partial |
Questions about the timber harvest
Related indicators
Indicator 13-1
How much timber is harvested annually?

larger versions – HTML | PDF
| Excel
Why is this important?
Timber harvests supported a large part of B.C.’s economic development and
continue to provide the economic base for many rural communities.
State and Trend
- The annual timber harvest from all public and private land increased
ten-fold during the 1900s, and levelled off in the 1990s.
- Concern about the rapid increase led to government regulation of harvest
levels to ensure sustainable timber supplies and community stability.
Beginning in 1949, government set allowable
annual cuts (AACs) to regulate harvest levels on public land and some
private land.
- Over the last ten years, the average total timber harvest was 77 million
m3 per year, of which 68 million m3 per year (89%) were from forests where
harvest levels are regulated by AACs.
- Almost all of the harvest regulated by AACs is from 37
timber supply areas (TSAs) and 33
tree farm licences (TFLs), for which the
provincial government’s chief forester sets AACs. These provided about 86%
of the total timber harvest over the last ten years. The government’s senior
decision-makers also set AACs for more than 800
woodlot licences and
community forests that comprised
3%.
- The remaining 9 million m3 per year (11%) were from lands with no
government-set AACs, primarily private land and some public land.
- Maps: Forest Management Units (PDF)
Information
- Detailed data on timber harvest volumes and areas by land status and
species exist for most of the past century, with only a few minor gaps.
- Data are publicly available in the Ministry of Forests and Range’s
annual reports.
- References: MFR’s
Annual reports,
Resource Tenures
- Related international and national indicators: MP
2.d; CCFM 5.3.1
Indicator 13-2
How does the timber harvest compare with the sustainable level?

larger versions – HTML | PDF
| Excel
Why is this important?
Environmental integrity and sustainable economic activity depend on
maintaining a long-term balance between forest growth and timber harvest.
State and Trend
- This comparison can be made for areas regulated by government-set AACs.
In the last ten years, these accounted for 89% of the total harvest.
- Each forest management unit’s AAC represents a sustainable harvest level
that balances environmental, economic and social considerations.
- In the last 10 years, the average harvest regulated by AACs was 68
million m3 per year, or 10% less than the sustainable level (sum of AACs) of
77 million m3 per year. Among the causes for this difference are market
fluctuations and delays in forest planning.
- AACs are the maximum average level of harvests for a five-year period.
Within this period, actual harvests may exceed AACs for a short period, if
offset by lower subsequent harvests.
- In the last few years, AACs of some management units have been increased
to address the current mountain pine beetle epidemic with pest control
measures and salvage programs. Decreases in the AACs of these units are
projected for the future.
- AACs have also changed to reflect new harvesting and milling
technologies (increases in the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s), new legislation (the
decrease around 1980), and the establishment of new parks and forest
practices (the decrease in the early 1990s).
- Maps: Forest Management Units (PDF)
Information
- Analyses and rationales for government-set AACs are publicly available.
Little information is available for forests without government-set AACs.
- References: MFR’s
Forest Analysis
- Related international and national indicators: MP
2.d; CCFM 5.3.1
Indicator 13-3
What is the provincial timber supply forecast?

larger versions – HTML | PDF
| Excel
Why is this important?
Stable timber supplies are important to the provincial economy and to
customers who rely on B.C.’s forest products.
State and Trend
- Timber supply forecasts are influenced by many factors: past harvest
levels, the current mountain pine beetle epidemic, the shift to harvesting
more second-growth forests and estimates of future growth rates. Current
harvests are based on accumulated volumes in older forests. Future harvests
will rely on the faster growth of second-growth forests.
- Increases in AACs, for pest control measures and salvage programs, the
provincial timber supply forecast peaks at 89 million m3 per year in 2007,
or 34% above the average actual harvest of 66 million m3 per year in the
1990s (before the AAC increases).
- A decrease to 73 million m3 per year is projected in 2014, followed by
further decreases until 2060. The forecast remains between 6% and 13% higher
than the average actual harvest in the 1990s.
- Maps: Forest Management Units (PDF)
Information
- Detailed timber supply forecasts and their related assumptions are
publicly available for timber supply areas and tree farm licences.
- Research shows that second-growth forests grow faster than previously
estimated. Higher growth rates have been verified by field sampling and
included in the timber supply forecasts for about half of the management
units. Unverified estimates are shown separately for the other half.
- Uncertainties in timber supply forecasting include merchantability of
species, operability, future management practices, the future harvestable
land base, wildfires and insect epidemics13. New AACs every five years, set
with the latest information, reduce the risks related to uncertainty.
- References: MFR’s
Forest Analysis,
Site Productivity
- Related international and national indicators: MP
2.d; CCFM 5.3.1
Indicator 13-4
How does the timber supply forecast vary locally?

larger versions – HTML | PDF
| Excel
Why is this important?
Stable timber supplies are important to local economies, especially in rural
areas with substantial economic dependence on the forest sector.
State and Trend
- Local timber supply forecasts vary considerably due to localized factors
such as the current mountain pine beetle epidemic and in the timing of the
shift to harvesting second-growth forests.
- Forecast changes in long-term timber supply for TSAs and TFLs show where
economic and social impacts can be anticipated.
- Decreases of 12% or more14 between 2000 and 2050 are forecast
in 16 TSAs and 12 TFLs. Large decreases can be expected to lead to changes
in the structure of local economies.
- Increases of 12% or more by 2050 are forecast in 2 TFLs. Increases in
timber supply create opportunities for economic growth.
- Maps: Forest Management Units (PDF)
Information
- Recent temporary AAC increases, related to the mountain pine beetle
epidemic, averaged over 50% in 7 TSAs and over 100% in 6 TFLs. Only one of
the 13 increases is included in data for 2000, making 2000 a good base for
comparison. Subsequent decreases in timber supply are projected to continue
for many years, including the forecast for 2050.
- Timber supply forecasts and their related assumptions, are publicly
available for TSAs and TFLs. Economic and social impact assessments are
publicly available for TSAs.
- Verified higher growth rates were used in forecasts for half of the
forest management units. Unverified estimates were not included in others.
- These forecasts are based on the current harvestable land base and
management practices.
- References: MFR’s
Forest Analysis,
Site Productivity
- Related international and national indicators: MP
2.d; CCFM 5.3.1
|
| Previous | Next |
The State of British Columbia’s Forests – 2006 |