FREP Reports are peer-reviewed, scientifically valid and statistically rigorous documentation of the results of monitoring and evaluations. Typical FREP reports will be posted along with a report summary, data and action plan. This information will be distributed to stakeholders (see listserve -- readers can subscribe by clicking here) by paper, email, and on the website.
Please click on the link below or scroll down the page to get to each report.
- FREP Report #1: Baseline Datasets for Evaluating Wildlife Tree Patches - November 2004
- FREP Report #2: Preliminary Assessment of the Effectiveness of Wildlife Tree Retention on Cutblocks Harvested between 1999 and 2001 under the Forest Practices Code - February 2005
- FREP Report #3: Evaluation of Cutblock Sizes Harvested under the Forest Practices Code: 1996-2002 - July 2005
- FREP Report #4: Geographical Information Systems Needs Assessment - August 2006
- FREP Report #5: Recreation Site Effectiveness Evaluation Project - October 2006
- FREP Report #6: An Evaluation of Range Use Plan Content in Four Forest Districts in British Columbia - March 2005
- FREP Report #7: State of Cutblocks: Resource Stewardship Monitoring for Stand-level Biodiversity 2005 - April 2007
- FREP Report #8: An Evaluation of Rangeland Health and Effectiveness of Plant Residue in Protecting Resource Values - March 2005
- FREP Report #9: An Evaluation of the Reforestation Strategies of the Fort St. John Pilot Project - September 2006
- FREP Report #10: Stand-level Biodiversity Monitoring in 44 Large Cutblocks in the Central Interior of British Columbia - September 2007
- FREP Report #11: Timber-Focussed Evaluation of Partially Harvested Areas: Are Stand Conditions Consistent with Government’s Objectives for Timber? - March 2007
- FREP Report #12: Worker Safety Impacts Associated with Legislation, Policy, Planning and Implementation of Forest Harvesting Activities in British Columbia - November 2007
- FREP Report #13: Are Free-Growing Stands Meeting Timber Productivity Expectations in the Lakes Supply Area? - May 2008
- FREP Report #14: Tree Species Composition and Diversity in British Columbia - August 2008
- FREP Report #15: Sampling Intensity for Stand-level Biodiversity Surveys - April 2008
- FREP Report #17: Resource Stewardship Monitoring: Stand-level Biodiversity Analysis of 2005/2006 Field Season Data by Biogeoclimatic Zone - November 2008
- FREP Report #18: A Review of Forest Stewardship Plan Results and Strategies for the Cultural Heritage Resource Value - November 2008
Links to Reports, Summaries, Meta Data & Action Plans
|
FREP Report #1, Huggard, D. 2004. Baseline Datasets for Evaluating Wildlife Tree Patches. B.C. Min. For., For. Prac. Br., Victoria, B.C. FREP Ser. 001.
The goal of this project was to compile existing datasets on tree and snag densities in unmanaged CWH, ESSF and ICH forests to allow baseline comparisons with wildlife tree patch (WTP) effectiveness monitoring conducted by the Ministry of Forests and Range (MoFR). Baseline datasets were obtained from a variety of sources across the province, representing 1175 individual sites (with a wide range of sampling intensities per site). A number of Excel files were created to summarize the baseline data and the MoFR WTP monitoring results.The files summarizing the baseline data and comparing them to the WTP effectiveness monitoring results are intended to allow users to make comparisons of particular habitat elements of interest. Example comparisons are presented and discussed for some basic elements (all stems, all snags, snags >10 m tall, snags and stems by size, wildlife tree class and species), but not all their innumerable combinations.
| ||||
|
FREP Report #2, BC Ministry of Forests. 2005. Preliminary assessment of the effectiveness of wildlife tree retention on cutblocks harvested between 1999 and 2001 under the Forest Practices Code. B.C. Min. For., For. Prac. Br., Victoria, B.C. FREP Ser. 002.
In January of 2002, the Forest Practices Branch of the BC Ministry of Forests and Range initiated this preliminary assessment of the adequacy of the provincial Wildlife Tree Policy as a coarse filter mechanism for conserving habitat for wildlife tree-dependent species. This project addresses the biological effectiveness of policy and resulting stand management practices and builds directly on the Phase 1 project "Evaluation of wildlife tree retention for cutblocks harvested between 1996-2001 under the Forest Practices Code." Explicit policy and management guidelines regarding wildlife tree retention were released initially in the Forest Practices Code of British Columbia (1995 Biodiversity Guidebook and 1999 Landscape Unit Planning Guide), followed by the provincial Wildlife Tree Policy and Management Recommendations in 2000.
| ||||
|
FREP Report #3, BC Ministry of Forests. 2005. Evaluation of Cutblock Sizes Harvested Under the Forest Practices Code: 1996-2002. B.C. Min. For., For. Prac. Br., Victoria, B.C. FREP Ser. 003.
As part of the Forest and Range Evaluation Program, this evaluation project was initiated to answer the following questions:
The 40/60 rule was established in 1995 under the Forest Practices Code to reduce the number and size of the large progressive clearcuts that were occurring across the province at that time. The 40/60 rule limits maximum cutblock size to 40 hectares in the Coast Forest Region (except the North Coast Forest District (NCFD) which was set at 60 hectares during the study period) and eight (8) districts in the Southern Interior Region. Maximum cutblock size is set at 60 hectares in the Northern Interior Region and five (5) districts in the Southern Interior Region. The 40/60 rule continues to apply today under the Forest and Range Practices Act.
| ||||
|
FREP Report #4, BC Ministry of Forests. 2006. Geographical Information Systems Needs Assessment. B.C. Min. For., For. Prac. Br., Victoria, B.C. FREP Ser. 004.
This report outlines the value of incorporating the use of geographical information systems (GIS) into the Forest and Range Evaluation Program (FREP). As the program grows in size and scope, GIS could become a valuable tool for:
The specific questions addressed by this preliminary GIS needs assessment were:
| ||||
|
FREP Report #5, British Columbia Ministry of Forests. 2006. Recreation Site Effectiveness Evaluation Project. B.C. Min. For., For. Prac. Br., Victoria, B.C. FREP Ser. 005.
The Recreation Site Effectiveness Evaluation Pilot Project was designed to gather baseline information about the current state of Ministry of Forests and Range (MoFR)recreation sites throughout British Columbia, and to evaluate the effectiveness of current recreation site management policies and practices within the province. More specifically, the project addresses the following primary research question:
| ||||
|
FREP Report #6, Fraser, D. 2005. Range Effectiveness Evaluations 2004: Part 1. An Evaluation of Range Use Plan Content in Four Forest Districts in British Columbia. B.C. Min. For., For. Prac. Br., Victoria, B.C. FREP Ser. 006.
The project objectives were to evaluate a selection of RUPs from four representative areas of the province to determine if current RUPs meet Code content requirements. Peace Forest District and Nadina Forest District in the Northern Interior Region (RNI) and 100 Mile House Forest District and Okanagan-Shuswap Forest District in the Southern Interior Region (RSI) were selected for this evaluation. These districts were chosen because they represent four of the significant regional landforms and vegetation types in British Columbia, and each district has significant numbers of range agreements and livestock grazing on Crown range.
| ||||
|
FREP Report #7, British Columbia Ministry of Forests. 2007. State of Cutblocks: Resource Stewardship Monitoring for Stand-level Biodiversity 2005. B.C. Min. For., For. Prac. Br., Victoria, B.C. FREP Ser. 007.
This report provides a proof of concept for a provincial summarization of the stand-level biodiversity resource stewardship monitoring under the Forest and Range Evaluation Program (FREP). A general summary is given for the 201 cutblocks sampled during the 2005 FREP field season. This was the first year of operational data collection for stand-level biodiversity. More detailed analysis results are presented for the 72 cutblocks that were sampled in the Sub-boreal Spruce (SBS) zone, where baseline data was available to allow for comparisons to natural trends.
| ||||
|
FREP Report #8, Fraser, D. 2005. Range Effectiveness Evaluations 2004: Part 2. An Evaluation of Rangeland Health and Effectiveness of Plant Residue in Protecting Resource Values. B.C. Min. For., For. Prac. Br., Victoria, B.C. FREP Ser. 008.
A Ministry of Forests team evaluated a number of representative Range Act agreement areas in four forest districts during September and October of 2004. Agreements with range use plans approved after December 31, 2000 were given priority. Key areas, selected to be indicative of management and level of use, within primary range were evaluated. Eighty-six sites were visited and the following data collected and analyzed: rangeland health (functionality), stubble heights, visual obscurity, browse utilization and form class, current and desired plant communities (seral stage), and invasive plant species. Digital photos were taken at each site. Of the 69 uplands evaluated, 25 rated as Properly Functioning Condition (PFC) to slightly at risk, 13 rated as moderately at risk, and 31 rated as highly at risk to non-functional. Of the 7 wetlands evaluated, 3 rated as PFC to slightly at risk, 1 rated as moderately at risk, and 3 rated as non-functional. Of the 10 stream reaches evaluated, 2 rated as PFC to slightly at risk, 4 rated as moderately at risk and 4 rated as highly at risk to non-functional.
| ||||
|
FREP Report #9, BC Ministry of Forests. 2007. An Evaluation of the Reforestation Strategies of the Fort St. John Pilot Project. B.C. Min. For. Range, For. Prac. Br., Victoria, B.C.
This report examines if the indicators of reforestation as outlined in the FSJPP SFMP sections 6.28, 6.29, and 6.30 are achieving the stated objectives by analyzing and comparing the information within the FSJPP Annual Report and Ministry of Forests and Range (MFR) data bases (RESULTS and FTA).
| ||||
|
FREP Report #10, BC Ministry of Forests and Range. 2007. Stand-level Biodiversity Monitoring in 44 Large Cutblocks in the Central Interior of British Columbia. B.C. Min. For. Ran., For. Prac. Br., Victoria, B.C. FREP Ser. 010.
This report presents monitoring results for 44 large cutblocks (> 100 ha) harvested between 1995 and 2005. In December 2005, British Columbia’s Chief Forester issued guidance on biodiversity management pertinent to large cutblocks. Therefore, the results reported here represent a pre-guidance baseline of stand-level biodiversity on large cutblocks.
| ||||
|
FREP Report #11, BC Ministry of Forests. 2007. Timber-Focussed Evaluation of Partially Harvested Areas: Are Stand Conditions Consistent with Government’s Objectives for Timber? B.C. Min. For., For. Prac. Br., Victoria, B.C. FREP Ser. 011.
In 2006, the ministry’s Forest and Range Evaluation Program (FREP) initiated a project to develop methods to evaluate in partial-cut areas the degree to which government’s objectives for timber (as specified in the Forest and Range Practices Act, FRPA) were being met. Methods for both routine and intensive evaluation were developed and then used in a trial evaluation. This report provides the 2006 draft version of the routine and intensive evaluation procedures and presents the results of their application in partial-cut stands in a management unit in south-eastern BC. Although the FRPA objectives set by government for timber include competitive delivered wood costs and the opportunity to exercise harvesting license rights, the evaluation focuses solely on the third objective - "to maintain or enhance an economically valuable supply of commercial timber." Because the FRPA objectives set by government for timber are so broad, and some components of them are not well suited to FREP evaluation, a portion of the objectives is not addressed by the evaluation procedure.
| ||||
|
FREP Report #12, British Columbia Ministry of Forests and Range. 2007. Worker Safety Impacts Associated with Legislation, Policy, Planning and Implementation of Forest Harvesting Activities in British Columbia. B.C. Min. For. Ran., For. Prac. Br., Victoria, B.C. FREP Ser. 012.
In 2005, a high number of fatalities and serious injuries occurred in British Columbia’s forest sector. Of the 50 fatality claims accepted by WorkSafeBC for this sector,1 33 deaths were recorded in the forestry and log-hauling categories. In response, the Forests and Range Practices Advisory Committee requested that the Forest and Range Evaluation Program (FREP) conduct an evaluation project to investigate some of the reasons behind these deaths and injuries. This report summary presents a brief overview of the evaluation project’s methodology, findings, and recommendations.
| ||||
|
FREP Report #13, BC Ministry of Forests and Range. 2008. Are free-growing stands meeting timber productivity expectations in the Lakes Timber Supply Area?. B.C. Min. For. Ran., For. Prac. Br., Victoria, B.C. FREP Ser. 013.
The current administrative milestone for ensuring effective reforestation is the free-growing declaration. When the free-growing milestone is achieved, it is assumed that the young managed stand is on a trajectory that will result in a productive mature stand. Currently, no monitoring procedures are in place to determine if free-growing stands are meeting these expectations. This study examines whether the reliance that has been placed on this policy is supported by stand performance from a timber yield perspective. We examined 60 randomly selected free-growing stands in the Lakes Timber Supply Area (TSA) of central British Columbia. We used the silvicultural planning model TIPSY to estimate projected volume at a rotation age of 80 years. Based on declaration and 2005 stand attributes, the mean projected volumes for all stands was about 320 m3/ha. Our values closely match the projected values from the most recent timber supply review for the Lakes TSA. The mean density of both well-spaced and free-growing stems has remained relatively stable since declaration with close to 1000 well-spaced stems per hectare.
| ||||
|
FREP Report #14, BC Ministry of Forests and Range. 2008. Species Diversity and Composition for British Columbia. B.C. Min. For., For. Prac. Br., Victoria, B.C. FREP Ser. 014.
This report examines the question: are our forest management practices resulting in a substantial change in the tree species composition of our forests? With increased intensity of silviculture practices, increased use of planting and decreased reliance on natural regeneration, are we affecting change that will result in outcomes that we do not understand? If we are simplifying forest ecosystems, are we reducing biological diversity? Maintaining diversity to manage risk is a practical approach to managing uncertainty. This report provides insight on trends in tree species composition as we move from natural to managed forests. Silviculture in British Columbia has been undertaken under different policy regimes and it is important to understand the impacts of those regimes. For this reason, information is presented in this report pertaining to three major time periods:
| ||||
|
FREP Report #15, BC Ministry of Forests and Range. 2008. Sampling intensity for stand-level biodiversity surveys. B.C. Min. For. Ran., For. Prac. Br., Victoria, B.C. FREP Ser. 15.
Two harvested cutblocks were thoroughly sampled using the Forest and Range Evaluation Program sampling methodology for stand-level biodiversity monitoring. This was done to assess the validity of the recommended plot sample intensity. The number of plots established was double or more the recommended plot sample intensity as described in the Protocol for Stand-level Biodiversity Monitoring (Province of British Columbia, 2007). Tree and coarse woody debris indicators were estimated based on varying numbers of the established plots. No bias was found in the estimation of the indicators for large trees, large snags, CWD volume or density of long pieces of CWD. The means of these indicators were relatively stable at all sampling intensity. However the precision of the mean (standard error) for the large snags density indicator is low at the recommended sampling density. The mean of number of species sampled does have an inherent bias influenced by sampling intensity. The number of species found tends to increase with increased number of sample plots.
| ||||
|
FREP Report #17, Resource Stewardship Monitoring: Stand-level Biodiversity Analysis of 2005/2006 Field Season Data by Biogeoclimatic Zone - Nov 2008
This report presents an analysis of resource stewardship monitoring (RSM) results for stand-level biodiversity done within the forest and range evaluation program (FREP). Results are presented for stand-level biodiversity monitoring in 643 cutblocks from eight biogeoclimatic (BEC) zones. The monitoring was done during the 2005 and 2006 field seasons. The sampled cutblocks were harvested during the years 1998 to 2004. The legislation in effect to guide forestry practices during that period was the Forest Practices Code of British Columbia Act. The sampling methodology used is described in the Protocol for Stand-level Biodiversity Monitoring: Steps for Field Data Collection and Administration (Province of British Columbia 2007). Data collected includes information on tree and coarse woody debris (CWD) retention, plus general information on retention patch size and location, ecological anchors (e.g. hollow trees, cavity nests), windthrow and invasive plants.
| ||||
|
FREP Report #18, BC Ministry of Forests and Range. 2008. Review of Forest Stewardship Plan Results and Strategies for the Cultural Heritage Resource Value. B.C. Min. For. Ran., For. Prac. Br., Victoria, B.C. FREP Ser. 18.
Cultural heritage resources are one of 11 resource values included under the Forest and Range Practices Act (FRPA). Under the results-based FRPA framework, forestry proponents must develop forest stewardship plans (FSPs) or woodlot licence plans that consist primarily of management results and (or) strategies for each FRPA resource value. These results and strategies must be consistent with all legal objectives set by government and all applicable requirements set out in the Forest Planning and Practices Regulation (FPPR). The objective set by government for the cultural heritage resource (CHR) value is: "to conserve and where necessary, protect, First Nations cultural heritage resources that are (a) the focus of a traditional use by an aboriginal people that is of continuing importance to that people, and (b) not regulated under the Heritage Conservation Act" (FPPR Section 10).
|