Table of Resource Value Indicators and Protocols

Information applicable to multiple resource value indicators:

The table below shows indicators and protocols by FRPA Resource Value. The table cells with a green background show that the indicators for that resource have been developed.

Value Status Resource Value Team  
Biodiversity Stand-Level:
Completed
 
Landscape-Level:
In Development
  • »  Nancy Densmore (co-lead), MFML (FPB)
  • »  Richard Thompson (co-lead), MOE
  • »  Rachel Holt, consultant
  • »  Laurie Kremsater, UBC
  • »  Dave Huggard, UBC
  • »  Louise Blight
  • »  Peter Bradford, MFML (FPB)
Field Forms
Field Protocols
Cultural
Heritage
Resources
Process Evaluations: Pilot evaluation project in progress
  • »  Peter Bradford (lead), MFML (FPB)
  • » The CHR working group is a collection of many dedicated individuals representing several First Nations and First Nations organizations, MFML district and regional offices, the Archaeology Branch (MTCA), the ILMB, FORREX and the Center for Non-Timber Resources at Royal Roads University.

Field Forms
Field Protocols (Outcome)

»  Protocol for Cultural Heritage Resource Stewardship Monitoring (PDF)

»  Handbook for CHR assessment (PDF)

Interview Protocols (Process)
Outcome Evaluations: Pilot in development
Fish/ Riparian Complete
  • »  Peter Tschaplinski (lead), MFML (RB)
  • »  Derek Tripp, consultant
  • »  Richard Thompson, MOE
  • »  Kevin Edquist, Forest Practices Board
  • »  Andrew Witt, MOE
  • »  Erland MacIsaac, DFO
  • »  Steve Bird, consultant
  • »  John Richardson, UBC
Field Forms
Field Protocols
Forage &
Associated
Plant
Communities
Under development
  • »  Francis Njenga, (lead) MFML (HRA)
  • »  Doug Fraser, MFML (HRA)
  • »  Rick Tucker, MFML (HRA)
  • »  Cindy Haddow, MoE
  • »  Reg Newman, MFML (RB)
Field Forms
Field Protocols
Recreation
Resources
Complete
  • »  Bill Marshall, (lead) MTSA
  • »  John Crooks, MTSA
  • »  Jennifer Eastwood, MTSA
  • »  Carl Johansen, MTSA
  • »  Noelle Kekula, MTSA
  • »  Paul Tataryn, MTSA
  • »  Gary Westfall, MTSA
  • »  Peter Bradford, MFML (FPB)
Field Forms
Field Protocols
Resource
Features
Complete
  • »  Christina Mardell, MFLNR (co-lead)
  • »  Jim Dunkley, MFML (co-lead)
  • »  Scott Dunn, MFML (DCR)
  • »  Sean Muise, MFML (DQC)
  • »  Peter Bradford, MFML (FPB)
Field Forms
Soils Cutblock Level:
Completed
 
Landscape Level:
Under Development
  • »  Shannon Berch, MFML (RB)
  • »  Chuck Bulmer, MFML (RB)
  • »  Bill Chapman, MFML (SIFR)
  • »  Mike Curran (SIFR)
  • »  Stephane Dube, MFML (NIFR)
  • »  Graeme Hope (SIFR)
  • »  Richard Kabzems (NIFR)
  • »  Marty Kranabetter (CFR)
  • »  Brian Wallace (SIFR)
Field Forms
Field Protocols
Timber Complete
  • •  Species and genetic diversity
  • •  Partial cutting
  • •  Free growing
  • •  Safety
  • »  Frank Barber, (lead), MFML (FPB)
  • »  Ralph Winter, MFML (FPB)
  • »  Leslie McAuley, MFML (TIB)
  • »  Pat Martin, MFML (FPB)
  • »  Tim Ebata, MFML (FPB)
  • »  Alex Woods, MFML (RNI)
Field Forms

»  Partial Cutting Field Card (PDF)

»  Stand Development Monitoring Field Card (PDF)

»  Stand Development Monitoring data template (Excel)

Field Protocols

»  Protocol for Stump Identification (PDF)

»  Protocol for Partial Cutting (PDF)

»  Stand Development Monitoring Protocol (PDF)- Draft - updated March 2011

»  How the use of the term “free growing” in British Columbia is linked to harvest date and assessment datel (PDF)

Visual Quality Complete
  • »  Jacques Marc, (lead), MFML (FPB)
  • »  Paul Picard, MFML (FPB)
  • »  Lloyd Davies, MFML (CFR)
  • »  Luc Roberge, MFML (NIFR)
  • »  Peter Rennie, MFML (SIFR)
  • »  Glen Pilling, Forest Practices Board
  • »  Gerrard Olivotto, consultant
  • »  Cameron Campbell, UBC
Field Forms/Protocols
Water Pilot Testing 2006 - 2008 Field Forms
Field Protocols
Wildlife In Development
  • » Kathy Paige (co-lead), MOE
  • » Laura Darling (co-lead), MFML (FPB)
  • » Melissa Todd, MFML
  • » Richard Thompson, MoE
  • » Cindy Haddow, MoE
Field Forms
Field Protocols
  • Under Development

Note 1 - Process of continuous improvement may result in changes to indicators and protocols. Please check this page on a regular basis for the most up-to-date version of indicators and protocols.

Note 2 - Individuals from various agencies, ministries and industry have been consulted and/or contracted for services during indicator development; however, these individuals names and affiliations have not been listed unless they are a member of a Resource Value Team.

Acronyms: