[Community Watershed Guidebook Table of Contents]

9 Forest road engineering

The Forest Practices Code regulations and Forest Road Engineering Guidebook contain many clauses that are intended to reduce the impact of road activities on water quality. The regulations and guidelines for activities in community watersheds emphasize increased standards for inventorying, planning and monitoring roads. But road construction and maintenance procedures are not expected to be different in community watersheds.

Requirements:

Target conditions

9.1 Forest road planning and design

9.1.1 General planning

9.1.2 Notifying water licensees

Prior to starting road construction or modification in a community watershed, the forest licensee must inform the water licensee, or a representative of the water users' community, and the designated environment official of the start date of road construction. This must take place at least 48 hours before road construction starts. Contact the local BC Environment office for a current list of contacts in each watershed.

9.1.3 Activities near the community water supply intake

Roads in community watersheds must not be located within a 100-m radius upslope of the water intake. Exceptions to this regulation are:

9.1.4 Terrain hazard mapping and field assessment

Refer to section 7 for information on terrain hazard mapping and field assessment requirements for roads.

9.1.5 Constructing roads on sensitive soils

In some cases, road construction across sensitive soil (i.e., the soil has a moderate or high likelihood for landslides or a high or very high surface soil erosion hazard) will be proposed because there is no alternate route. Such a road cannot be approved unless a person experienced with road construction across unstable soils prepares a field assessment and detailed design. After 1997 the design must be signed by professional engineer or a professional geoscientist.

The design must include plans and profiles of the entire section of road that crosses the sensitive soils, and must clearly show the measures that will be taken to minimize the hazard. The district manager, after reviewing the assessment report and proposed road design, still can refuse to approve the road plan if the risk is considered unacceptable.

If the design is approved, the engineer or geoscientist will indicate whether a construction or post-construction inspection is required.

9.1.6 Water quality

Where water quality objectives or criteria are established, road construction, modification, maintenance and deactivation must not cause water quality, measured at the community water intake or other designated monitoring station, to fall below these standards.

If water quality does fall below these standards, BC Environment will survey the contributing streams in the watershed or do detailed water quality monitoring to determine the cause. If road activities are the cause, all contributing road-building activity in the community watershed must cease until remedial measures are completed. See section 5 "Water quality monitoring" for how to establish water quality objectives.

9.1.7 Estimating culvert size

Stream culverts in community watersheds must be designed to pass the 100-year return period instantaneous peak flow (Q100) without the water surface rising above the top of the culvert inlet (with zero head), unless a professional engineer has designed inlet and outlet protection measures.

This requirement is intended to avoid several problems.

Because of the lack of streamflow information for most of the province, especially for small watersheds, it is very difficult to estimate the 100-year return period instantaneous peak flow. Confidence limits are generally very wide and the accuracy of estimates low. However, this criterion provides a consistent benchmark of relative risk against which audits can be conducted.

Soon, new methods based on British Columbia conditions will more directly provide design data on peak flows and culvert sizes. Once these have been completed and field tested, this guidebook will be updated to document the results. More information can be obtained from BC Environment's Hydrology Branch, Water Management Program, and Ministry of Forests Research Branch.

The following procedures must not preclude other reasonable and generally accepted methods for determining design flows and culvert size. Bridges or major culverts (2000 mm or greater, or design peak flow greater than 6 m3/s) must be designed by professional engineers who are ultimately responsible for designing adequate stream-crossing structures.

Culvert size based on site information

Basing culvert size on stream dimensions (described in the Forest Road Engineering Guidebook) assumes that the flow at bankfull stage is the mean annual peak flow, or Q2. This assumption may not apply for all situations. Also, the area of culvert opening required for a 100-year return period flow is assumed to be three times the area required for Q2.

The bankfull level often is not readily apparent. Figure 7 shows how to identify this feature; it is where there is a distinct change from unvegetated channel to streamside vegetation.

Figure 7. Identifying bankfull width (after Church, 1992).

A key element in obtaining a flow estimate is to select a reach of stream with a length about five times the bankfull width, in which flow is fairly uniform and shows no backwater effect.

The following steps should be followed (see Figure 8).

  1. Measure the width of the channel at the top of the bank (W1) and the stream bottom (W2) in metres. Be careful that the measurements are of the streamflow channel, not of the channel after scouring by debris flow.
  2. Measure the depth of the channel at several spots to obtain the average depth (D) in metres.
  3. Calculate the cross-sectional area of the channel: A = (W1 + W2)/ 2 x D
  4. Calculate the area of the required culvert opening: Ac = A x 3
  5. Size the pipe, using Table 8. Use the smallest pipe area that exceeds the required area. For a log culvert, select an opening size greater than Ac.

Figure 8. Stream cross-section.

Table 8. Round pipe diameter and cross-sectional area required for various discharges

This method for determining culvert size cannot be used on channels that have been affected by debris flow. Instead, culvert size should be based on the estimate of Q100 described in the next section.

Culvert size based on hydrologic information

On some streams it may be difficult to measure channel dimensions or to estimate the bankfull flow. In those cases, the culvert size should be based on an estimate of Q100 deduced from analyzing historical flows.

Estimates from gauged watersheds

For each BC Environment region, there is a Guide to Peak Flow Estimation for Ungauged Watersheds. The guide includes regional peak flow data analysis for gauged watersheds. Copies are available at forest region offices, or can be ordered from the Surface Water Section, Hydrology Branch, BC Environment. These guides can be used to estimate flows for culverts to be installed in watersheds similar to the gauged watersheds. Because gauging is typically conducted on larger streams, this information may be less reliable for small streams.

A regional approach (Church, 1992) similar to that in the BC Environment Guide to Peak Flow Estimation is described below. Q2 is estimated using an equation which includes a factor to account for regional variations. For culvert sizing, it is assumed that Q100 is three times Q2.

Steps:

  1. Determine the watershed drainage area A (km2) from the best available topographic map (usually 1:20 000 scale TRIM).

  2. Determine the regional factor k from the map (Figure 9).

  3. Estimate the two-year return period daily peak flow Q2 for the watershed by using the following equation:

  4. Multiply Q2 by 3 to estimate Q100.

  5. Size the pipe, using Table 8. Use the smallest pipe diameter that exceeds the corresponding Q100. For a log culvert, select an opening size Ac corresponding to Q100.

Figure 9. British Columbia k contours: k values for streamflow estimation.

Example

A watershed near Nelson has a drainage area of 2 km2.

From Figure 9, the watershed has a k factor of 1.0.

Q2 = 1.0 (2.0)0.68 = 1.6 m3/second.

Q100 = 3 x Q2 = 4.8 m3/second.

From Table 8, the required pipe diameter is 1800 mm.

Estimates from British Columbia Rational Formula

The rational formula is a method of estimating flows in small watersheds from regional rainfall intensity data and gross watershed characteristics. For each forest district, curves of Q100 against drainage area have been plotted, based on the B.C. Rational Formula. Copies of the graphs can be obtained from Surface Water Section, Hydrology Branch, BC Environment.

Estimates from culvert surveys

Another approach (which will add to the currently small peak flow data base) is to survey existing culverts in the forest district to record evidence of past peak flow events at each culvert.

Steps:

  1. Select culverts for which installation dates are available, on streams of various sizes (based on drainage area and channel size). They should show clear evidence of high water marks (debris, sand or scour lines) and not have been overtopped.

  2. Using culvert nomographs, determine the peak flow passed by the culvert as indicated by the high water marks.

  3. Based on hydrometeorological data for the region for the period the culvert has been in place, estimate a return period for the culvert high water mark flow.

  4. Determine the watershed area A (km2) from the best available topographic map (usually 1:20 000 scale TRIM).

  5. Peak flow estimates can be plotted against drainage areas for zones within a forest district which are assumed to be homogeneous with respect to peak flow variation (Figure 10). Depending on the reliability of the data, it may be possible to define a curve which relates peak flow of some return period to drainage area. Regional peak flow data can be used to adjust these flows to Q100.

Figure 10. Sample plot of culvert unit discharge versus drainage area.

Culvert size based on debris flow potential

If the stream has a moderate or higher potential for debris flow, the design of the drainage system should be based on the maximum debris flow rather than the water flow. There is not a strong correlation between expected peak flows in a watershed and the possible debris flow torrent volumes. Debris flow volumes can exceed ten times the peak flow discharge.

The Gully Assessment Procedure Guidebook provides a hazard rating system for coastal streams that have debris flood or flow potential. Where there is a significant debris flood or debris flow hazard, refer to the Ministry of Forests Working Paper 22 – Debris Flow Control Structures for Forest Engineering (Van Dine, 1996). The drainage system for the crossing should incorporate the following:

9.2 Construction and modification

9.2.1 General construction guidelines

Road ballast and surfacing

Revegetation

9.2.2 Guidelines for drainage structures in community watersheds

Drainage structures (general)

Ditches and cross-drain culverts

Stream-crossing culverts

Bridges and major culverts

Fords

9.2.3 Acid-generating rock

Metallic ores or coal strata commonly contain sulphide minerals that, when exposed to air and water (as liquid or vapor), become unstable. Potentially, this can generate acidic (low pH, high sulphate) runoff, commonly termed acid rock drainage. Where materials that generate acid rock drainage are exposed by road construction or used as aggregate in road construction, pH reductions and elevated concentrations of metals in water can result. These can harm aquatic life and exceed safe drinking water guidelines for humans.

Where an area of potential acid rock drainage is known in a community watershed, take these actions:

Where acid-generating rock formations cannot be avoided, manage acid rock drainage according to the Acid Rock Drainage Technical Guides (1992) published by the Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources.

9.3 Maintenance

9.4 Deactivation

9.4.1 Temporary (seasonal) deactivation

9.4.2 Semi-permanent deactivation

Deactivate very high hazard roads semi-permanently when future access is required but regular use is suspended for more than three years.

Restore natural flow patterns by removing all stream culverts and installing fords where possible, if access is required during a period of deactivation. Inspections and maintenance are required on semi-permanently deactivated roads.

Remove all road fill material below the high water line of a channel.

On moderate to high hazard roads, the natural drainage pattern must be restored. Remove all existing stream culverts and restore channel stability. Install fords, where possible, if access is required during the period of deactivation. Alternatively, stream culverts must be backed up with similarly sized cross-ditches on the downhill side.

For all moderate to high hazard sites, remove cross-drain culverts and replace with cross-ditches. Ditch blocks must be intact. Make sure the cross-ditch angle redirects water back into its original channel. Alternatively, cross-drain culverts must be backed up with similarly sized cross-ditches on the downhill side. Add cross-drains at approximately twice the frequency of cross-drain culverts, in all but very dry locations.

Dig additional cross-ditches:

Remove or put gaps in any windrows on the road surface.

If there is a high risk of slope failure or stability of the fill is questionable, pull sidecast back onto the outsloped road grade to ensure drainage.

9.5 Monitoring water quality during road construction, maintenance or deactivation

Forest Practices Code regulations require that road construction, modification, maintenance and deactivation must not cause water quality to fail to meet the objectives set by the Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks. Particular water quality objectives apply to a certain site or reach of a watercourse and are designed to protect the most sensitive water use (see section 5.1 "Water quality objectives").

This requirement is only relevant where a water quality monitoring station has been established at the intake of the community watershed for the purposes of monitoring raw water quality. Water quality objectives must be established by Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks for that watershed or for the hydrological zone within which the watershed is located.

For information on monitoring the baseline water quality during road engineering, see section 5 "Water quality monitoring."


TOP OF PAGE BACK NEXT PAGE